<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Hi-Fi Page</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hifipage.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hifipage.com</link>
	<description>Pure HiFi - Zero Fluff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:00:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on High End Audio Sounds Crap! by multimedia essex</title>
		<link>http://www.hifipage.com/high-end-audio-sounds-crap-206/comment-page-1/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>multimedia essex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hifipage.com/?p=206#comment-813</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;multimedia essex...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]High End Audio Sounds Crap! &#124; The Hi-Fi Page[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>multimedia essex&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]High End Audio Sounds Crap! | The Hi-Fi Page[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Wattage Does Not Matter by fitness[trainer/coach</title>
		<link>http://www.hifipage.com/why-wattage-does-not-matter-6/comment-page-1/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>fitness[trainer/coach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hifipage.com/?p=6#comment-753</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;fitness[trainer/coach...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Why Wattage Does Not Matter &#124; The Hi-Fi Page[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>fitness[trainer/coach...</strong></p>
<p>[...]Why Wattage Does Not Matter | The Hi-Fi Page[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on High End Audio Sounds Crap! by Mark Ab</title>
		<link>http://www.hifipage.com/high-end-audio-sounds-crap-206/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hifipage.com/?p=206#comment-341</guid>
		<description>Wow, this has taken me 45 years to find someone with the same view as mine!!! I have a &#039;home made&#039; system that is essentially made from a pair of Yamaha P2200 amps with Yamaha graphic equalizers, JBL front speakers and EV PA rear speakers. The sound is as good as anything I&#039;ve heard including the top end expensive systems. Thankyou so much for this article. I can now go forward with my system in the belief that I followed my true ears and not the rest...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this has taken me 45 years to find someone with the same view as mine!!! I have a &#8216;home made&#8217; system that is essentially made from a pair of Yamaha P2200 amps with Yamaha graphic equalizers, JBL front speakers and EV PA rear speakers. The sound is as good as anything I&#8217;ve heard including the top end expensive systems. Thankyou so much for this article. I can now go forward with my system in the belief that I followed my true ears and not the rest&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Greatest Lie of the Digital Age by Quin</title>
		<link>http://www.hifipage.com/the-greatest-lie-of-the-digital-age-28/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Quin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 02:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hifipage.com/?p=28#comment-335</guid>
		<description>Aluwolf, shut up. Want some advice? Read the whole conversation, and you might consider not commenting again :)...just for your sake...your gna loose against the guy, you cant argue, he will always  win ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aluwolf, shut up. Want some advice? Read the whole conversation, and you might consider not commenting again <img src='http://www.hifipage.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8230;just for your sake&#8230;your gna loose against the guy, you cant argue, he will always  win <img src='http://www.hifipage.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on High End Audio Sounds Crap! by dan_mason</title>
		<link>http://www.hifipage.com/high-end-audio-sounds-crap-206/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>dan_mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 07:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hifipage.com/?p=206#comment-310</guid>
		<description>Ralph,
I really like your point of view because it&#039;s matches mine. If it sounds good, it sounds good! Measuring distortion, SNR or any figure is no indication of how you much you will enjoy a performance.

Unfortunately there is generally little difference in the quality of recording, and subsequently its realism, between a live and studio recording. In fact studio recordings tend to be much easier to make &quot;realistic&quot; due to the engineers having broader control of the environment (as well as the options of having multiple takes, etc.).

In any case, I have an extensive collection of both live and studio recordings in almost all genres of music, on CD, SACD and vinyl and there tends to be little to separate them in terms of quality or realism.

I don&#039;t think I&#039;m being harsh at all. You would be surprised at how many of these supposed &quot;high end&quot; companies try to rip off unsuspecting customers. The range of nonsense out there is extensive. It&#039;s unforutnate that men tend to be susceptible to &quot;measurebation&quot;. I&#039;m just hoping that I can help a few of these guys see the real picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph,<br />
I really like your point of view because it&#8217;s matches mine. If it sounds good, it sounds good! Measuring distortion, SNR or any figure is no indication of how you much you will enjoy a performance.</p>
<p>Unfortunately there is generally little difference in the quality of recording, and subsequently its realism, between a live and studio recording. In fact studio recordings tend to be much easier to make &#8220;realistic&#8221; due to the engineers having broader control of the environment (as well as the options of having multiple takes, etc.).</p>
<p>In any case, I have an extensive collection of both live and studio recordings in almost all genres of music, on CD, SACD and vinyl and there tends to be little to separate them in terms of quality or realism.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m being harsh at all. You would be surprised at how many of these supposed &#8220;high end&#8221; companies try to rip off unsuspecting customers. The range of nonsense out there is extensive. It&#8217;s unforutnate that men tend to be susceptible to &#8220;measurebation&#8221;. I&#8217;m just hoping that I can help a few of these guys see the real picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on High End Audio Sounds Crap! by Ralph Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.hifipage.com/high-end-audio-sounds-crap-206/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 09:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hifipage.com/?p=206#comment-305</guid>
		<description>While there is certainly a lot of snake oil circulating round audiophile circles I think you&#039;re being too harsh. 

Is it possible that you have made the most elementary of errors? Of course recorded music is never going to sound real on playback - if it was recorded in a studio. But live recordings - which capture the sound field of the stage as modified by the whole auditorium, could be another matter entirely.

Maybe the goal of hi-fi isn&#039;t simply accuracy per se but the pleasure that undistorted representation of fine detail adds to the listening experience. If it&#039;s not 100% accurate but sounds absolutely great, who cares?

Personally I prefer listening to studio recordings. And I prefer warmth to brightness. You can&#039;t beat them old valve amps for sheer musicality IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While there is certainly a lot of snake oil circulating round audiophile circles I think you&#8217;re being too harsh. </p>
<p>Is it possible that you have made the most elementary of errors? Of course recorded music is never going to sound real on playback &#8211; if it was recorded in a studio. But live recordings &#8211; which capture the sound field of the stage as modified by the whole auditorium, could be another matter entirely.</p>
<p>Maybe the goal of hi-fi isn&#8217;t simply accuracy per se but the pleasure that undistorted representation of fine detail adds to the listening experience. If it&#8217;s not 100% accurate but sounds absolutely great, who cares?</p>
<p>Personally I prefer listening to studio recordings. And I prefer warmth to brightness. You can&#8217;t beat them old valve amps for sheer musicality IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Greatest Lie of the Digital Age by Aluwolf</title>
		<link>http://www.hifipage.com/the-greatest-lie-of-the-digital-age-28/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Aluwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hifipage.com/?p=28#comment-157</guid>
		<description>yes but any hdmi cord is set a standard, meaning all hdmi cords will work as long as they arent too long. An expensive HDMI cord may give you better reception at longer distances, but normally it just isnt need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes but any hdmi cord is set a standard, meaning all hdmi cords will work as long as they arent too long. An expensive HDMI cord may give you better reception at longer distances, but normally it just isnt need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on High End Audio Sounds Crap! by Jonathan Derda</title>
		<link>http://www.hifipage.com/high-end-audio-sounds-crap-206/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Derda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 01:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hifipage.com/?p=206#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Well put.  One time I was fooled my reproduced sound.  It was a CEDIA expo in Indianapolois where the Colts play.  I swear i heard a live jazz trio and after seeking out the source of the sound I ran into a large MBL system.  It wasn&#039;t until I was standing right in front of it that i realized it wasn&#039;t real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put.  One time I was fooled my reproduced sound.  It was a CEDIA expo in Indianapolois where the Colts play.  I swear i heard a live jazz trio and after seeking out the source of the sound I ran into a large MBL system.  It wasn&#8217;t until I was standing right in front of it that i realized it wasn&#8217;t real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Greatest Lie of the Digital Age by Does the quality of HDMI cables make a difference? &#124; The Hi-Fi Page</title>
		<link>http://www.hifipage.com/the-greatest-lie-of-the-digital-age-28/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Does the quality of HDMI cables make a difference? &#124; The Hi-Fi Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hifipage.com/?p=28#comment-146</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed&#8217;s post on whether digital is perfect, we received an impressive response from readers who voiced their own opinions about the subject. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed&#8217;s post on whether digital is perfect, we received an impressive response from readers who voiced their own opinions about the subject. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Rack &#8211; Results by Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.hifipage.com/the-rack-results-169/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hifipage.com/?p=169#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Well done! I loved reading your journey. I&#039;m recently into hifi and have learnt heaps - great friends and lots of research. I&#039;ve been looking for a rack but have been not impressed with the ridiculous prices. So I&#039;ve been thinking of making one. Yours is fantastic - inspirational. But I&#039;m not a metal-worker. So I decided another plan:
Find  a second hand rack with all the important qualities, flexibilities, and potential to improve and adjust it to make it fantastic. 
So I found one -  a factory second

It has a few defects like small paint spots and incorrect size shelves that can be fixed easily. It has a metal frame with MDF shelves and looks very similar  to yours. It also has spikes for each shelf level so the shelves can be separated easily and reconfigured. The  I will put the kiln-dry sand into it. May be I&#039;ll have to seal a few places - but I&#039;m thinking Sealey&#039;s filler will do this. I&#039;ll experiment and then consider changing the shelves to thicker wood or granite perhaps. The current shelves are 8mm.  MDF .
So thanks for your journey it really helped give me confidence and search for a &#039;compromise&#039; that ticked all the boxes.
Kind regards, Bob from Melbourne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Well done! I loved reading your journey. I&#8217;m recently into hifi and have learnt heaps &#8211; great friends and lots of research. I&#8217;ve been looking for a rack but have been not impressed with the ridiculous prices. So I&#8217;ve been thinking of making one. Yours is fantastic &#8211; inspirational. But I&#8217;m not a metal-worker. So I decided another plan:<br />
Find  a second hand rack with all the important qualities, flexibilities, and potential to improve and adjust it to make it fantastic.<br />
So I found one &#8211;  a factory second</p>
<p>It has a few defects like small paint spots and incorrect size shelves that can be fixed easily. It has a metal frame with MDF shelves and looks very similar  to yours. It also has spikes for each shelf level so the shelves can be separated easily and reconfigured. The  I will put the kiln-dry sand into it. May be I&#8217;ll have to seal a few places &#8211; but I&#8217;m thinking Sealey&#8217;s filler will do this. I&#8217;ll experiment and then consider changing the shelves to thicker wood or granite perhaps. The current shelves are 8mm.  MDF .<br />
So thanks for your journey it really helped give me confidence and search for a &#8216;compromise&#8217; that ticked all the boxes.<br />
Kind regards, Bob from Melbourne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

