Archive for January, 2010
A friend recently introduced me to a writer who has achieved worldwide fame and respect for a couple of his books, most notably Tipping Point and Blink. I became quite interested in what he has had to say after viewing a short clip of his views on the GFC, so I got myself a copy of his Blink to read while commuting to and fro work.
Malcolm Gladwell is a Canadian writer who lives in New York. His works are mostly short, “research” and “data” filled commentaries on many subjects, most commonly on social sciences. In Blink – The Power of Thinking Without Thinking, he explores the theory that we very rapidly make subconscious decisions and intepretations and use them to make decisions. His arguments are largely based on studies and tests done by others into fields such as marital interaction, social studies, human intuition and prejudices. If you are interested in this sort of thing, I’d suggest not to purchase his work. It’s a silly and glorified case of obsurdity that most people should be smart enough to realise that the author is a man of typical American religious naivety.
Gladwell’s theories are formed under studies and evidence he has gathered. One example is particularly notable.
A group of so called “scientists” did a study on gamblers. They placed four decks of cards, two blue and two red, on a table and asked someone to turn them over. Each card either won or lost the gambler some amount of money. The cards were rigged in a way such that the blue cards were, on a whole, optimal for winnings and generally produced favourable results with steady winnings and modest penalties, and the red cards were a minefield – having high rewards but higher losses. This team of “scientists” then measured how quickly the test subject noticed what was occuring by measuring the sweat glands on their subject’s skin. They found that the gamblers generally began to notice what was happening within about 50 cards. They also noticed that the gamblers started generating stress responses to the red cards by the 10th card.
His conclusion was that the gamblers “figured the game out before they realised they had figured the game out…long before they were consciously aware of what (was occuring)”.
This is the classic example of over-simplification and over-assumption – something I’d like to term “Gladwelling”. A completely plausible and much simpler explanation for these results would be that the gamblers correctly felt that the red cards had more risk. That is, more variance. Higher risk results in more shock, nervousness and emotion, which explains the readings. The subjects’ reactions may well have been a simple adverseness to risk, rather than a lower overall return.
What does this have to do with hi-fi?
Because this sort of thing happens all the time. People over-simplify the world despite the fact that there are clear reasons why we don’t just compare two figures to determine the properties of two real world things. Why does a Japanese sports car cost 1/5th of the price of an Italian thoroughbred, even though on paper they have nearly the same performance specs? Which idiot would buy a Leica camera if its specs were only as good as a Canon or Nikon? People need to read between the lines.
The fact that people say “X branded amplifier is more conservatively rated compared to Y branded” is in itself, proof that comparing specs is a silly exercise. If specs can be made to be more or less conservative, then their integrity is lost and scientifically speaking they are completely pointless. To me, a specification should be a standardised, strictly controlled way of measuring an extremely simple factor. RMS power, for example, should be true RMS and never “short term”. The whole idea that RMS could be “short term” is silly, since Root Mean Squared requires the signal to be evaluated over the longest possible period. Anything less is a compromise, and completely eliminates any science behind the figure.
Another thing that bugs me is the way people draw conclusions from “evidence”. I often find articles on the net from studies which show a whole range of ludacris “relationships”. For example, the other day I read a study which showed that obesity causes depression. Sure, there are tests which indicate that obesity is linked to depression. But how does one draw the conclusion that it is obesity which causes depression and not the other way round? How does one draw the conclusion that it is not a third factor which may be causing both, for example a gene or a mental health issue?
Anyone who has a basic understanding of statistics and sampling analysis would understand the concept of “data mining”. Additionally, the fact that even if a link is proven mathematically true, there can be no straightforward “cause-effect” conclusion without extensive further investigation.
In hi-fi, this is all too common. We draw conclusions based on the tiniest, most meaningless figures. The world is too complex to be represented by a set of numbers on a page. Don’t be a fool – question everything. Don’t be Gladwelling your view of the world.
I need to go and buy a cable organiser. Otherwise, it looks pretty cool.
OK, so a number of people have been following me on this journey. Here’s the info you wanted:
- Total cost of materials: about $500 AUD. The acrylic was around $300, but was cut to size and all I had to do was polish the edges. The steel was around $50. The rest was paint, sand paper, etc. I did get the feet for free and they may cost a bit normally, but I suppose you could use something like spikes on a metal floorprotector or something. My only concern with that is if you accidentally put that into your floor or your foot, the results will not be pretty. The entire rack weighs probably around 60kg or so. I completely botched up the calculations before. The shelves weren’t 2kg each, they’re about 8.5kg each. So just the shelves weigh in at 34kgs.
- Welding can be difficult at the start but if you practice a bit, you’ll get the hang of it. I wouldn’t recommend building a rack like this if you’ve never welded before, due to the 90 degree joints which are much more difficult to weld than a flat butt joint. So if you’re doing this for the first time I’d recommend practising HEAPS before you start zapping your final work. One good thing about welding is that you can grind down any mistakes.
- I hate filling. I HATE filling. Did I mention that I hate it? Maybe it’s because of the hot weather and my inexperience, but I had to redo some of the filling about 8 times before I got it right. It’ll certainly be easier next time, but can I just say…I hate filling. The sanding part kills me.
- When I first approached my design I thought alot about rigidity and lowering resonance by having high structural strength. But if I had to do it again I’d be more adventurous with the design. The steel I’ve used is extremely strong. Even when really stretched they hardly flex at all, and after some research (& my own experimentation) I found them to be less resonant than aluminium. Next time I’m thinking of removing the T joint at the top, and be even more minimalist…
- The whole thing took me around a week to build, working about 8 hours a day. Not exactly worth the time strictly, but it was a lot of fun in the end and even though my fingers are still a bit red fron sanding, I’d do it again.
- Next time I build a rack (this time next year at earliest) I’m going to try fill it in with lead shot as well as sand. This would make it even more rigid and less resonant.
Anyway, so here’s what really matters:
I can’t say if it makes a huge impact on the sound, but it certainly makes some impact. It’s rather hard to “test” given that I can’t easily shift my system on and off my rack. But I’ve noticed that it improves the sound of my CD/SACDs much more than LP. I used to listen to CDs and find it slightly more detailed but quite colder than LP. But now it’s really getting quite close to LP quality in terms of “thickness”. It’s obviously still not as warm or a “charming” kind of sound, but with this rack I’d say that for the first time in my hifi life I’ve considered selling my turntable.
But fear not! For I won’t. I have too many records and the phonostage is a crappy old one I built years ago. I’m quite certain if I replaced it then LP would be back in front, but it’s an indication that the rack may be doing something right.
Detail, realism, “thickness”, height and to some extent soundstage were the key improvements on CD. The LP improved slightly but I don’t feel that it was a huge gain in any department. They’re my initial thoughts on the sound. I’ll keep listening and report on results…
If you guys have any more questions, please feel free to fire it my way. Use the contact page up top that Ed has kindly set up.
Ok so everything’s done and I just gotta put it all together tonight.
Sand fill, bolts installed, shelves cleaned and installed…
Again, if you were to do this, remember to use kiln dried sand.
I’m quite happy with the way it came out. It’s quite an industrial sort of minimalist look.
Cleaned up the acrylic sheet. I used silicon self adhesive rubber feet to mount the acrylic onto the frame.
Unfortunately it’s nearly 12am and I won’t be able to listen today. Results will be published in the coming days.
I ordered some acrylic shelves a while back and now I have to polish their sides. I’m using a polishing wheel attachment on a drill, and some metal polish. I also bought some of this vuplex stuff which does the final clean and buff.
Results are in:
Smooth and shiny. Mmmmmmmmmmmm…..
One good thing about hot, sunny weather is how fast you can paint. Today’s the sort of day I can prime, undercoat, and topcoat in about 20 minutes. Unlike filling, painting I like.
Got up early to paint, and it’s already done. I decided to go for a matt silver finish. 2 coats of primer and 4 undercoats, plus a topcoat.
Having a break now, and while the frame sets I’m going to start polishing off the acrylic. I’ve purchased a polishing wheel attachment for my drill, with some metal polish. More to come today…
Wow. I hate filling.
Maybe it’s because my lack of experience. But god it was hard work. It’s been rather hot here and the auto filler hardens in about 30 seconds – before I could even stop mixing. By the time I’ve put the stuff onto the rack, it’s the consistency of chewing gum. I had to redo alot of the filling.
More tomorrow. I’m done for today.
I’m rather tired, but at the same time pretty excited. Have a look at today’s achievements.
Legs, stoppers and rests are all on.
Tomorrow is going to be fill day. Fill fill fill…
Not the most exciting part. I hate sanding. But the results should be worth it.
Got up at 6am this morning to start building. I must admit, I was surprised at how quickly and easily I was able to put the basic thing together. I mounted everything on a flat surface, clamped it down, and within an hour I had a free standing structure.
Check it out!
Angle grind down the welds, and voila.
I also welded some nuts onto some squares which fit the ends of the columns. This is going to be used as stoppers for the sand fill.
I made a little bottom sealed compartment to put the legs in.
Speaking of legs, here’s what they look like:
As you can see, the critical part is a ball that rests onto a rubber covered steel plate. They’re also super adjustable.
Picked up my acrylic sheet (AKA perspex) as well. Check it out…
They’re super heavy (about 1.5-2kg each), and sonically dead. (ed: matt botched up the calculations, they’re actually 8.5kg)
Tomorrow, I’m planning to mount the legs, mount the shelf rests and finish grinding everything back.
Went out and bought materials. Being in Australia, there’s not alot you can source in terms of cool extruded aluminium or shelf fittings. We only have structural mild steel, nuts, bolts and to be on the exotic side, my dad’s awesome vibration isolation feet.
Anyway. Here’s a list of the stuff:
- 65mm square mild steel, 3mm thick (Inspired by when I built a shed with the same stuff. It’s cheap, easy to weld and very, very strong).
- A bag of kiln dried sand. If you’re ever planning to fill a rack, speaker, plinth with anything, you MUST use kiln dried sand. Normal sand has moisture still in the grains and, over time, will cause rust, mold and general unpleasantness. Stay away from normal sand.
- 25mm acrylic sheet shelves. I decided to use acrylic instead of MDF. It not only looks better, but has more mass. It’s also acoustically dead, and the same material as that of my turntable platter. Cool…
- Nuts, bolts, to finish the sand fill stoppers and to attach on the legs.
- Heavy duty, vibration isolating, full adjustable feet. These things can swivel, adjust for angle and height. I’m not sure what their cost is but I suspect they’re pretty expensive. They’re sourced from my dad who works in precision engineering. They use these feet to mount huge machinery which need vibration isolation to achieve extremely low tolerances. Lacking this I suppose you could use good old spikes or ball bearings on metal floor protectors (which ideally should be rubber lined on the bottom).
- Auto body filler.
- Steel weld wire.
- I still need to get paint, but I haven’t decided on the colour yet.
More to come soon. Here’s a picture of what the steel looks like: